The American Cancer Society will sponsor a Relay For Life Craft Fair Nov.8 at North Anderson Baptist Church. Participating vendor will display more than 31 products including Tupperware, baked goods, jewelry designers, and much much more. If you are interested in becoming a vendor please contact Cynthia Brewer at 314-6271 or email email@example.com.
For the third year in a row, zombies will invade downtown Anderson to benefit a local charity.
Pints for the People, the group that started the Electric City Zombie Pub Crawl in 2012, will once again organize zombies into a charity-donating horde.
On Saturday, starting at 6 p.m., small groups of zombies will follow live bait from bar to bar in downtown Anderson. Starting at Club 134 and ending at Uptown Lounge participants will find food and drink specials at participating establishments. Zombies will also be entered into costume contests where they can win prizes. All of proceeds from the event will go to Foothills Alliance.
“Our goal this year was to expand the make the event better for everyone involved, from the zombies, to the restaurants and bars, as well as for Foothills Alliance. We've reorganized it somewhat and will be working hard to bring in a few surprises throughout the night," said Mason Carey, president of for Pints for the People. “We want to ensure that each year it's different and fun for our return zombies and our newly undead."
Pints for the People was created by a group of several concerned residents and business owners in Anderson who wanted to see fun events downtown that raised money for local charities. So far the group has raised more than $7,500 in the past year to benefit Foothills Alliance, the Anderson Free Clinic and Good Neighbor Cupboard, among others.
Foothills Alliance is a nonprofit agency that encompasses three programs: Sexual Trauma Center, Child Advocacy Center, and Prevent Child Abuse. Foothills Alliance was formed when three agencies were merged in July 2001. Prior to the merger, the Sexual Trauma Center operated for 11 years as an independent non -profit agency providing 24-hour crisis intervention services to residents of Anderson and Oconee counties. Before merging with the Alliance, Prevent Child Abuse had been in existence since 1990, run solely by volunteers in the community. The Child Advocacy Center was a new program that was developed in 2001 and became part of the Alliance that same year.
The mission of Foothills Alliance is to provide child abuse prevention initiatives in Anderson County and crisis intervention services to child and adult victims of sexual assault in Anderson and Oconee counties and to serve as their advocates in the community. Today, Foothills Alliance offers multiple FREE services to the community. Not only does the Alliance focus on helping children and adults heal from their abuse but also in preventing abuse from ever taking place.
By M. J. Goodwin
October is Domestic Violence Awareness month. In my 23 years as a practicing attorney in Anderson, South Carolina, I have seen numerous cases of terrible domestic violence. Sadly, I have also seen cases of false allegations and even fabricated situations. All these situations are bad. In any similar situation, both parties benefit from experienced legal counsel. In short, whether you are the victim or the accused, it’s time to call a divorce lawyer.
Orders of Protection are governed by statute and are very serious. The relevant law can be found here: http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t20c004.php One of the many consequences of an Order of Protection is that is prevents the possession of firearms and therefore has Second Amendment implications. A benefit of an Order of Protection that doesn’t exist with a “regular” restraining order is that the order of protection provides for an offender to be arrested on sight in case of a violation of the order. This distinction is not readily understood by most litigants and therefore, having a divorce attorney to explain it can be helpful in removing some of the mystery of what is going on. Orders of Protection expire after a year, at most. Restraining Orders in court orders such as Divorce Decrees do not expire. This distinctions are all important. Particular considerations vary depending on the specific situation.
Having an Order of Protection is not the same thing as being charged with Criminal Domestic Violence in criminal court. A criminal court can impose certain bond restrictions, such as not being around the alleged victim. But that is not the same thing as an order of protection. This recently came up in the context of a child’s emergency room visit. The mother alleged that she had an order of protection against the father and therefore sought to deny him seeing their child who had been injured while the child was in the ER. The criminal charges had been dismissed and no order of protection actually existed. But due to the high visibility and publicity of domestic violence, and due to well-meaning but ignorant hospital staff, the father was denied contact with the child. It took an attorney to sort this out and to obtain an order prohibiting the mother from any such further fabrications (father’s point of view) or misunderstandings (mother’s point of view).
If you are victim of domestic violence, or if you are falsely accused of domestic violence, or even if you are an abuser, you will benefit from having an experienced family law attorney with you in Court.
Contact M. J. Goodwin, a divorce lawyer in Anderson, SC with 23 years of experience at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Democrat Vincent Sheheen is running as hard as he can for governor in the final few weeks before the election, trying to make up the 60,000-vote margin in his race with Gov. Nikki Haley in 2010.
But perhaps his fate was sealed as soon as he decided to take on Haley a second time. Sheheen is struggling to get traction from voters who already know him. While Haley has weathered several small scandals, there is no big issue to hang on her as she runs for a second term.
Sheheen also faces independent candidate in Tom Ervin. Their campaign war chests are similar - each has about $3.5 million - although Ervin is using his own money, while Sheheen had to raise his. Both offer a lighter brand of conservative than the governor, and both want South Carolina to take money for Medicaid expansion, want to increase teacher pay and think Haley is a poor manager who only reacts when there is a crisis.
Ervin gives voters that don't like Haley, especially those who lean a bit conservative, a fresh choice, said Scott Buchanan, a political scientist at The Citadel.
"Once you get the nomination for an office one time, it's not that common to come back four years later and get it again. Sheheen is showing why that can be a struggle," Buchanan said.
As the days to the election dwindle, Sheheen isn't slowing down. He makes two to three campaign stops most days, hammering home a message that the Republican governor ignored education, chases poor paying jobs that do nothing to improve people's lives, inflates those job announcement numbers and is too ethically challenged to lead South Carolina for four more years.
"If people who want honest government show up at the polls, I'll win the election," Sheheen said.
Polls aren't too friendly to that idea. A survey of likely voters by Winthrop University at the end of September had Haley at 44 percent with Sheheen about 10 percentage points behind. Recent polls have looked worse.
Anderson County Council voted to drop “Interim” from the title of Anderson County Administrator Rusty Burns Tuesday night, following a unanimous recommendation from the personnel committee earlier in the month. The vote was delayed in the Oct. 7 county council meeting because the proposal did not make it on the agenda for that meeting.
The proposal passed by a a vote of 5-0, with Anderson County Councilman Eddie Moore and Anderson County Councilwoman Cindy Wilson abstaining.
Anderson County Councilman Francis Crowder, who chairs the committee, said that Burns' salary would remain the same, and that there would be no contract and “everything will continue as it is.”
Wilson praised Burns’ record during his tenure, but said because she believed the timing of the vote recalled 2009 she would abstain from the vote.
Council also approved a resolution asking the South Carolina General Assembly in the local government fund to provide tax relief for Anderson County property owners.
“We are supposed to be getting $9 million, and we are getting less than $7 million,” said Anderson County Councilman Tom Allen. “They are not following the law that they themselves passed.”
Earlier, council approved on second reading tax incentives for Stanco Metal Product, Inc., creating 10 new jobs at an average $18.35 wage. The company has been in Anderson for more than 30 years, and the new investment totals $5.9 million.
On Tuesday night, council:
Crowder allocated an additional $14,000 from his paving account, in addition to an earlier allocation of $8,000 from his recreation funds, for a parking and a possible park and playground. The $8,000 were for plans in phase one of the project, and the $14,000 will be used to pave the lot.
Approved on first reading tax incentives for a company from the West Coast, Project East, a 15-year-old organic agribusiness, which will create 27 new jobs at an average salary of $18.74 and a $6.9 million total capital investment.
Honored Anderson Area Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Lee Luff for his “outstanding leadership and dedicated service to the Anderson community; his involvement with local governments and businesses; and for showcasing our community and welcoming visitors.
Recognized Andersonville Baptist Church on their 175th anniversary.
Proclaimed Oct. 19-24 “Starburst Storytellers Festival Week.”
Anderson County's unemployment rate fell to 5.9 percent in September, after a jump to 6.3 percent in August. It is the first drop in unemployment since April in Anderson County, which boasts the fifth lowest jobless rate in the South Carolina.
Jobless rates either went down or were unchanged in all of South Carolina's 46 counties, according to state officials. But those numbers are not seasonally adjusted, so they can't be directly compared with the state unemployment rate.
Hospitals in South Carolina are providing the same amount of charity care, if not more, than they were before the Affordable Care Act insurance marketplace launched last year, a South Carolina Hospital Association executive said this week.
"There are some hospitals where it's worse, some hospitals where it's the same. It's not going down - I know that," said Rozalynn Goodwin, the hospital association's vice president for community engagement.
"I wouldn't surprise me to see minimal or no impact (from the Affordable Care Act)," said Dr. Pat Cawley, CEO of Medical University Hospital. "We haven't seen any big change in the numbers at MUSC."
South Carolina hospitals provided more than $1 billion worth of uncompensated care last year to low-income patients who were uninsured and ineligible for Medicaid. The state and federal governments reimbursed them $471 million for it during the 2014 fiscal year.
"I think we forget - someone not having insurance doesn't mean that hospitals aren't being paid to care for that person," said S.C. Medicaid Director Tony Keck. He noted that hospitals across the state still made a $1.1 billion profit last year. "I don't know what data the (hospital association) has to back up their statement."
One of the main objectives of the federal health care law is to reduce the percentage of residents across the country without insurance. But South Carolina is one of about half of all states that will not participate in the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, so hospitals here are still treating many low-income, uninsured patients, Goodwin said.
The Supreme Court made Medicaid expansion an optional provision of the law in 2012. Most conservative states, including South Carolina, opted out.
"We didn't have the type of enrollment that a lot of other states had," said Goodwin. The South Carolina Hospital Association supports Medicaid expansion. Keck, a member of Gov. Nikki Haley's Cabinet, does not.
Still, Medicaid enrollment is growing here, he said. More than 85,000 people have newly enrolled in the low-income health insurance program since Jan. 1, bringing total enrollment in the state to about 1.1 million residents.
Anderson County Sheriff John Skipper announced today the beginning of the 2014 Fall Membership Drive for the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association. Skipper is an active member of the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association and invited the citizens of Anderson County to join the Association as Honorary Members.
The South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association provides advocacy using the strong unified voice of South Carolina’s 46 elected Sheriffs. The Association is a key player in shaping state policy on public safety and crime prevention, as well as providing critical training to Sheriffs’ teams. “With government funding becoming increasingly difficult to secure, the membership drive has taken on greater importance than ever before”, said Sheriff Skipper. “The funding is vital to help us carry out our mission of making our communities safer places to live, work, and play.”
Membership appeals will be sent out through a direct mail piece over the coming days. Individuals choosing to join the voluntary program can do so for as little as $25, while businesses can show their support for a $50 contribution. The funding provides critically important technical resources, training, and legislative support on key criminal justice issues. It is important to note that contributions are tax deductible.
“I realize that everyone does not have the ability or desire to become an Honorary Member of the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association”, said Sheriff Skipper. He went on to say, “But, rest assured that your inability to join this reputable organization will not impact the level of service you receive from my office. I would simply ask you to consider joining the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association as an Honorary Member if you have the means and are so inclined.”
Individuals that do not receive a membership appeal and would like more information can contact the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association by phone at (803) 772-1101 or online at www.sheriffsc.com. The association can also be reached by mail at 112 Westpark Blvd., Columbia, SC 29210.
Sheriff Skipper would like to remind everyone that the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association does not solicit via telemarketing. If you receive a phone call from someone claiming to be calling on behalf of the South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association, know that it is a fraudulent call and hang up.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) is furious some former Nazis are still collecting US social security benefits and she intends to introduce a bill to take them away.
"It's deeply disturbing and I'm deeply disturbed that these individuals continue to receive Social Security benefits even after the Justice Department identified them as Nazi war criminals," Maloney told Business Insider on Tuesday.
The Associated Press reported Sunday that dozens of suspected Nazi war criminals have collected millions in benefits over the years after they were expelled from the US. The AP investigation found US officials had used Social Security payments as a negotiating tool when securing agreements for the Nazis to voluntarily give up their US citizenship and leave the country.
"My legislation would close that loophole," the veteran Upper East Side lawmaker vowed. "If you're a Nazi war criminal, you're a Nazi war criminal. You should not be receiving Social Security benefits. Period."
Maloney said there are some promising signs for her bill, including support in the Senate from Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pennsylvania). The White House said Monday it agrees that these suspected war criminals should not be receiving the benefits.
However, the fact alleged Nazi war criminals are about as unsympathetic a target as one could find, Maloney said the bill's passage is not a foregone conclusion.
"You never know. I have a great deal of respect for anything that passes the United States Congress. I think this should be a slam dunk," she said.
Maloney has also called for an investigation into the matter at the Justice Department and the Social Security Administration. The Justice Department told Yahoo News it was reviewing the request.
As far as cutting off benefits to other people accused of serious crimes, Maloney cited terrorists as another group that should not be collecting taxpayer dollars as they enter their elderly years.
"Then I'll look at cutting off benefits to terrorists that are deported," she said.
Canon Andrew White, the Anglican pastor who's known as the Vicar of Baghdad, says that after U.S. troops left Iraq in 2011, the country has been facing "total devastation," even worse than under Saddam Hussein. White also described what Christians are facing as one of the worst persecutions in history.
"It was total devastation, it was the most horrendous thing," White told The News Tribune in Takoma, Washington, Sunday when speaking about the persecution Christians have endured in Iraq since the U.S. pulled its troops out in 2011. "The terrible thing that the Americans have to realize is that all of their intervention, everything they tried to do, has totally been wasted. Nothing has been achieved by this at all."
He continued, "Are we worse now than under Sadam? A million times worse."
Speaking to an audience at the Life Center church in Takoma, White was critical of Obama's decision to pull troops out of the country in 2011, instead of leaving over 10,000 soldiers, which the Iraqi government had requested.
"The reason we have this tragedy now is because you came in and you left us too soon," he emphasized. "We weren't ready to be left. Your military gave their lives, they worked to save our country, and then they left us. And I said, within three month, we will have terrorism ... and we did."
"I think it could be one of the worst persecutions of Christians in history," he explained.
While Republicans in Congress shout, "Repeal Obamacare," GOP governors in many states have quietly accepted the law's major Medicaid expansion. Even if their party wins control of the Senate in the upcoming elections, they just don't see the law going away.
Nine Republican governors have expanded Medicaid for low-income people in their states, despite their own misgivings and adamant opposition from conservative legislators. Three more governors are negotiating with the Democratic administration in Washington.
Rather than demanding repeal, the governors generally have sought federal concessions to make their decisions more politically acceptable at home. That approach is in sharp contrast to the anti-Obamacare fervor of their party in Congress.
Ohio Gov. John Kasich says he doesn't think there will be a repeal in Washington, even if Republicans win a Senate majority and consolidate their hold on the House in next month's election.
"That's not gonna happen," the Republican governor told The Associated Press during a recent re-election campaign swing.
Both major party candidates to be South Carolina's top educator said Monday that they support the idea of revamping school funding guidelines and are in favor of looking at ways to do that in a more equitable way.
Republican Molly Spearman and Democrat Tom Thompson talked about the issues facing the state's next education superintendent on South Carolina Educational Television. The debate was taped at 2 p.m. Monday and will be shown on statewide SCETV networks at 7 p.m.
Spearman was director of the South Carolina School Administrators Association. Thompson is a former dean of graduate studies at South Carolina State University.
A third-party candidate, Ed Murray of the American Party, was not invited. Current Republican superintendent Mick Zais isn't seeking re-election.
Here are the candidates' thoughts on a couple major topics facing education.
On Monday, both candidates said they'd favor looking at a way to fund schools more equitably. Spearman said she would stress to lawmakers that more than one-time money is needed to ensure schools have a steady funding stream and implement local solutions.
"It can't just be a one-year fix," Spearman said.
Thompson said he would favor exploring a funding model that would share more of the wealth when a large corporation like Boeing or BMW comes to a certain part of the state. Spearman agreed, saying that she'd favor looking at ways to share part of that benefit, given that such companies get incentives from the state.
Spearman stressed that South Carolina's school funding model is middle-aged and is based on severely outdated methods.
"We put too much burden on the local community, and I do think it's a state responsibility," she said.
In previous encounters, the two candidates have disagreed on federal involvement in education, particularly when it comes to Common Core. The math and English benchmarks have been adopted in dozens of states, including South Carolina, and describe what students should know after completing each grade, so they're ready for college and careers after high school.
On Monday, Spearman said she supported state lawmakers' decision to set up panel to review the state's standards, reiterating her opinion that "Washington does become too involved sometimes."
"We have to have high standards approved by South Carolinians," Spearman said. "That will be my No. 1 focus."
Thompson said the process of determining exactly what the standards will look like needed to be a collaborative one and said that, as education chief, he would be responsible for bringing in the right people to get the job done.
"The federal government is not the problem here," Thompson said. "The federal government is not our enemy."
Spearman said she has already begun discussions with people who are involved in evaluating the current standards.
"I'm very optimistic," she said, saying it's vital to teach children how to problem solve and not just regurgitate information.